AIMS: Agentic Inspection and Maintenance Strategy — V2
Cost of breakdown or cost of care?
Version 2 of the asset strategy film on a light OPUSm canvas: a calendar strip, real AIMS screens in SAP FSM, the health score and the closed learning loop.
Chapters
- Cost of care: A calendar strip draws itself across the screen and the AIMS name and tagline set in.
- The question: Service visits tick along the strip every 90 days, because it has always been 90 days.
- Too little: Visits grow sparse and breakdowns drop onto the strip with downtime, repair cost and safety risk.
- Too much: Visits crowd the strip and technicians find nothing wrong, visit after visit.
- One size: Three assets share the same 90 day ticks while each one needs a different rhythm.
- Your history: The strip fills with history already in SAP FSM, and the answer is read from it.
- What it reads: Equipment, notifications, breakdown flags and closures flow in, with a notifications screen shown.
- Looking back: Yield and fault clustering are drawn on the strip as findings and repeating damage and cause pairs.
- Looking forward: A failure curve shows early, random and wear-out regimes and risk pulls critical assets closer.
- Reality checks: A reading drifts toward its limit inside the P-F window while a confidence meter fills with data.
- The score: A 0 to 100 health score moves and the strip intervals stretch or shrink, with the product screens.
- The proposal: A planner reviews the reasoning, approves, and the interval is written back to SAP.
- Built-in learning: A closed loop turns every job into learning, with root cause and FMEA screens, analytics and an AI agent.
- Built to trust: Safety limits, the 25 percent step cap and the back-test then shadow pilot path appear.
- End card: The strip settles and the closing line, product name and OPUSm logo hold.
- Follow us: OPUSm, LinkedIn and website links.